Saturday, November 2, 2013
Friday, November 1, 2013
Friday, October 11, 2013
Friday, May 31, 2013
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Friday, March 22, 2013
BETTER THAN GEORGE WASHINGTON?
You
think you're better than George Washington? George Washington risked
his life for freedom. George Washington waded through mud and cold
and heat and hell of every kind for 7 years to create an army to fight against
the British in the name of a new kind of political freedom that he
believed in. George Washington left his farm that he loved and his
wife that he loved even more and sweated and worried over a ragtag,
undernourished, undersupplied army because he believed in freedom.
George Washington turned down an offer to become a kind of King of
America because he believed in freedom. George Washington became
president and gave 8 more years to his country because he believed in
freedom.
I
know, I know. George Washington had slaves. George Washington
presided over a country in which slavery was allowed in the
Constitution even though he and many others were well aware that
slavery compromised their vision of freedom. But they allowed this
slavery as a compromise that made a union possible. They knew that
without this union, there could be no experiment in freedom. They
knew that the freedom they had created was not perfect and would take
a long time to become perfect, but they figured it was better to try
to create the conditions of political freedom and deal with the other
issues later or there could never have been any kind of union. And
without that union, there would be no way to resist British force. So
Washington and others compromised with the Southern states to protect
their union and to create a possibility of a kind of political
freedom that had never really been tried before.
They
knew it wasn't perfect. They knew it might all fall apart at any
time. But they believed in freedom and they did something about it.
They did the best the could under the circumstances in which they
lived and they fought and risked everything for their experiment.
What
have you done for freedom that you feel so righteous? What have you
risked that makes you better than Washington and Jefferson and
Franklin and Madison? And most of all, what makes you think that the
freedom they created had to be perfect in order to be worth pursuing?
Don't you understand that American freedom is still a work in
progress? Don't you see that your courage and your skill and your
dedication and willingness to risk all are still necessary in order
for the experiment of freedom to mean anything? Or are you all just
lazy, cynical, crybaby takers who think that somebody owes you
something? If you think America is just an existing power that should
or even could just hand out freedom like candy, then you are deluded.
You are weak. You are a fool and you are nothing. You couldn't hold
George Washington's knickers. If you believe in freedom, then shut up
with the criticism and do something about it. Otherwise, you will
deserve the slavery towards which you and your children are headed.
Thursday, March 7, 2013
NEGATIVE VIEWS OF HUMANITY
In the end, even I concede that human nature can't be entirely defined or limited by those living today. Some version of evolution may still take place or some deep change of heart could sweep across a large mass of humanity due to extreme circumstances. No one can know everything about the future.
Still, the overall composition of humanity seems unlikely to change to me. A certain percentage will almost always be deeply bad and there will be a certain number of ambivalent, questionable types who can be drawn in to do bad things for gain of some kind. Most people will remain basically neither good nor bad. They will mostly seek security and a kind of selfish freedom.
At the other end of the spectrum will be those who are inspired by something or someone to stand up and fight for something. There will always be people who lives as examples of something most of us are inclined to call goodness. But all these types will probably always be with us. The only thing that could be altered would be the percentages in which the various types appear. Literature such as Primo Levi's Survival in Auschwitz supports this view and even modern, up-to- the-minute science has become increasingly skeptical about major changes in what we usually refer to as human nature (see Steven Pinker's The Better Angels of Our Nature or Edward O. Wilson's Consilience).
At any rate, this question should always be approached with some delicacy. To preach about the nobility and goodness of humanity seems childish and naive beyond measure after the moral disasters of the 20th Century. To preach only negative, vicious things about human nature seems peevish and bitter and motivated by the kind of hatred that is born of jealousy, envy and failure.
In practical terms, being too positive makes you seem naive and being too negative can stop people from taking any kind of action because negativity enters the veins as a kind of poison. Once negativity becomes cynicism, it negates possibility.
Still, the overall composition of humanity seems unlikely to change to me. A certain percentage will almost always be deeply bad and there will be a certain number of ambivalent, questionable types who can be drawn in to do bad things for gain of some kind. Most people will remain basically neither good nor bad. They will mostly seek security and a kind of selfish freedom.
At the other end of the spectrum will be those who are inspired by something or someone to stand up and fight for something. There will always be people who lives as examples of something most of us are inclined to call goodness. But all these types will probably always be with us. The only thing that could be altered would be the percentages in which the various types appear. Literature such as Primo Levi's Survival in Auschwitz supports this view and even modern, up-to- the-minute science has become increasingly skeptical about major changes in what we usually refer to as human nature (see Steven Pinker's The Better Angels of Our Nature or Edward O. Wilson's Consilience).
At any rate, this question should always be approached with some delicacy. To preach about the nobility and goodness of humanity seems childish and naive beyond measure after the moral disasters of the 20th Century. To preach only negative, vicious things about human nature seems peevish and bitter and motivated by the kind of hatred that is born of jealousy, envy and failure.
In practical terms, being too positive makes you seem naive and being too negative can stop people from taking any kind of action because negativity enters the veins as a kind of poison. Once negativity becomes cynicism, it negates possibility.
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND INJUSTICE
The treatment of women and children in any country is one of the best indicators of the degree of justice to be found in that country.
INJUSTICE TODAY
Today,
millions of lives around the world are in the grip of injustice.
More
children, women and men are held in slavery right now than over the
course of the entire trans-Atlantic slave trade: Millions toil in
bondage, their work and even their bodies the property of an owner.
Trafficking
in humans generates profits in excess of 32 billion dollars a year
for those who, by force and deception, sell human lives into
slavery and sexual bondage. Nearly 2 million children are exploited
in the commercial sex industry. The AIDS pandemic continues to
rage, and the oppression of trafficking victims in the global sex
trade contributes to the disease's spread.
In
many countries around the world, pedophiles find that they can
abuse children with impunity. And though police should be
protectors, in many nations, their presence is a source of
insecurity for the poor. Suspects can be held interminably before
trials, imprisoned for crimes they did not commit.
The
land rights of women are violated on a massive scale worldwide, but
with particular ferocity in Africa, leaving widows and other women
in vulnerable positions unable to care for themselves or their
children. Around the world, women suffer the double trauma of rape
- and seeing their perpetrators face no consequences.
Often
lacking access to their own justice systems and unable to protect
themselves or their families from those more powerful, it is
overwhelmingly the poor who are the victims of these brutal forms
of abuse.
FROM
THE INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION WEBSITE
WOMEN
AND POVERTY
Women
make up half of the world's population and yet represent a staggering
70% of the world's poor. For the millions of women living in poverty,
their lives are a litany of injustice, discrimination and obstacles
that get in the way of achieving their basic needs of good health,
safe childbirth, education and employment. Overcoming these
inequalities and ensuring that women benefit from development
requires that the needs and desires of women are not only taken into
account, but be put front and centre.
We
live in a world in which women living in poverty face gross
inequalities and injustice from birth to death. From poor education
to poor nutrition to vulnerable and low pay employment, the sequence
of discrimination that a woman may suffer during her entire life is
unacceptable but all too common. What does this look like throughout
a woman's life?
As
a baby born into poverty, she might be abandoned and left to die,
through the practice of female infanticide. Worldwide, there are 32
million 'missing women'. During her childhood, her proper feeding and
nutrition may be neglected out of family favouring of male children.
As
a girl or woman she may be a victim of female genital mutilation and
cutting. 100 to 140 million girls and women around the world have
undergone genital mutilation, including 6.5 million in Western
countries. Embedded in cultural norms, this act is often carried out
with the consent of mothers, in conditions that lead to lifelong
pain, infection and premature death. As an adolescent she may be
required to have an early marriage.. and young pregnancy puts girls
at risk of maternal deaths.
"a
mother dies every minute"
At
child-bearing age, she could die from haemorrhaging during
childbirth, one of the most common causes of maternal mortality for
anaemic or undernourished pregnant women. Of the 500,000 women who
die in childbirth every year, 99% live in developing countries. In
other words, in developing countries, a girl or a woman dies every
minute in giving birth.
At
working age, she does not have the same job opportunities and
receives less pay for the same work.
Women
work two-thirds of the world's working hours, produce half of the
world's food, but earn only 10% of the world's income and own less
than one percent of the world's property. On average, women earn half
of what men earn.
Informal
employment is a greater source of employment for women than for men.
The reality of the informal economy for women is more stark. While it
can offer life-changing opportunities to earn money, the low pay and
lack of social protection makes women vulnerable and open to
exploitation.
Over
her lifetime, she may suffer unimaginable violence and neglect, often
in silence. Three million women die each year because of gender-based
violence, and four million girls and women a year are sold into
prostitution. One woman in five is a victim of rape or attempted rape
during her lifetime. Gender-based violence takes more of a toll on
women's health than that of traffic accidents and malaria combined.
As
a woman living in poverty, she represents the majority of the world's
poor. Women make up 70% of the world's one billion poorest people.
These
stark inequalities happen everyday, everywhere around the world, yet
despite the clear message that figures send, progress towards gender
equity in development is deplorably slow and the obstacles of
political indifference are nearly overwhelming. In the 2005 Massey
Lectures, speaking on his role as UN Special Envoy for HIV/AIDS in
Africa, Stephen Lewis argued that,
"The
atmosphere of benign neglect, compounded by the rooted gender
inequality, all adds up to a death sentence for countless millions of
women in the developing world. For whatever reason, we can't break
the monolith of indifference and paralysis."
In
many societies, women struggle with exercising their human rights,
fulfilling their basic needs and participating in decision-making.
Such disadvantage is both ubiquitous and historical amongst the
world's poor. Modern societies have developed on unequal foundations
of legal frameworks and economic structures that undervalue women,
label them as 'caregivers' and fail to recognize them as fundamental
participants of a healthy society. The efforts in recent decades to
address these inequities have been met by astonishing lack of
support, to the point at which Lewis has also argued that,
"There
is no greater emblem of international hypocrisy than the promise of
women's rights."
The
education of girls has been shown enhance maternal and child
nutrition and lower mortality rates, inhibit the spread of fatal
diseases like HIV/AIDS, and reduce birth rates. Unfortunately, in
many parts of the world, girls do not attend school because of
reasons as simple as lack of decent sanitation facilities or the need
to spend hours each day collecting water.
FROM
THE GLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT WEBSITE
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
CELEBRATING MURDERERS
TOM
I want you to look at the handout I gave you. These are actual quotes from Che Guevara. I want you to ask yourself if this is really the kind of person you want to become. Do you have enough heart to look your supposed enemies in the eye and put a bullet in their brains? Are you willing to stain your rifle red with slaughter? Ready to throw away every rule of law in favor of arbitrary murder? If so, I think you are living in the wrong country. So unless you're willing to do these things, I'd say you're either a dupe or a liar for wearing those Che Guevara t-shirts around campus. If you want to support the poor and the exploited masses, then go out and do it and don't hook your name up with a cold-blooded freedom-hating murderer.
I want you to look at the handout I gave you. These are actual quotes from Che Guevara. I want you to ask yourself if this is really the kind of person you want to become. Do you have enough heart to look your supposed enemies in the eye and put a bullet in their brains? Are you willing to stain your rifle red with slaughter? Ready to throw away every rule of law in favor of arbitrary murder? If so, I think you are living in the wrong country. So unless you're willing to do these things, I'd say you're either a dupe or a liar for wearing those Che Guevara t-shirts around campus. If you want to support the poor and the exploited masses, then go out and do it and don't hook your name up with a cold-blooded freedom-hating murderer.
"Crazy with fury I will stain my
rifle red while slaughtering any enemy that falls in my hands! My nostrils
dilate while savoring the acrid odor of gunpowder and blood. With the deaths of
my enemies I prepare my being for the sacred fight and join the triumphant
proletariat with a bestial howl!"
"Hatred as an element of struggle;
unbending hatred for the enemy, which pushes a human being beyond his natural limitations, making him into an
effective, violent, selective, and cold-blooded killing machine. This is what
our soldiers must become … "
"To send men to the firing squad,
judicial proof is unnecessary...These procedures are an archaic bourgeois
detail. This is a revolution! And a revolutionary must become a cold killing
machine motivated by pure hate. We must create the pedagogy of the The Wall!
Ernesto 'Che' Guevara
Ernesto 'Che' Guevara
CHE GUEVARA IS DEAD
GET OVER IT
THE GREEKS STAND UP
“Since you are continuing this destructive policy,
we warn you that you cannot make us fight against our brothers. We refuse to
stand against our parents, our brothers, our children or any citizen who
protests and demands a change of policy,” said the union, which represents more
than two-thirds of Greek policemen. We warn you that as legal representatives
of Greek policemen, we will issue arrest warrants for a series of legal
violations … such as blackmail, covertly abolishing or eroding democracy and
national sovereignty” Reuters
MITCHELL'S LAWS
Mitchell’s
laws:
●The more federal budgets are cut and taxes
increased, the weaker an economy becomes.
●Austerity
is the government’s method for widening the gap between rich and poor, which
leads to civil disorder.
●Until the
99% understand the need for federal deficits, the upper 1% will rule.
●To survive
long term, a monetarily non-sovereign government must have a positive balance
of payments.
●Those, who
do not understand the differences between Monetary Sovereignty and monetary
non-sovereignty, do not understand economics.
●The
penalty for ignorance is slavery.
●Everything in economics
devolves to motivation.
From Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
http://mythfighter.com/
From Rodger Malcolm Mitchell
http://mythfighter.com/
Monday, March 4, 2013
HEADLINES
‘INCREASINGLY
DEBAUCHED’: ARE SEX, DRUGS & POOR SANITATION ECLIPSING OCCUPY WALL STREET?
INDIA:
THREE GIRLS RAPED AND MURDERED, AGED 5, 9 AND 11
INDIA
GANG RAPE: WOMAN ASSAULTED BY BUS DRIVER, CONDUCTOR
INDIA’S
FATAL RAPE WAS TYPICAL IN A COUNTRY THAT DEGRADES WOMEN
VICIOUS GANG RAPE IN SOUTH AFRICA
OVER 30 MINERS KILLED IN CLASH WITH POLICE AT SOUTH AFRICA'S LONMIN MARIKANA MINE
THOUSANDS ACROSS GREECE PROTEST AUSTERITY
BULGARIAN PRIME MINISTER RESIGNS AFTER ANOTHER
NIGHT OF PROTESTS
ROMANIAN GOVERNMENT RESIGNS OVER ECONOMY AFTER
THREE WEEKS OF PROTESTS
HEDGE
FUNDS ‘LAND-GRABBING’ IN AFRICA
"When these investors promise progress and
jobs to local chiefs it sounds great, but they don't deliver."
The report said the contracts also gave investors
a range of incentives, from unlimited water rights to tax waivers.
"No-one should believe that these investors are there to feed starving
Africans.
US UNIVERSITIES IN AFRICA 'LAND GRAB'
Institutions including Harvard and Vanderbilt
reportedly use hedge funds to buy land in deals that may force farmers out
STOP DREAMING ABOUT POWER
CLAIRE
If your main concern is keeping power,
then you don't really care about anything. Power is an illusion
anyway – it's an illusion that has to be maintained by cruelty and
paranoia. The force you waste on keeping other people in line only
creates your destruction. It only turns you into a monster who
deserves destruction. Holding onto power is a sickness. It's the same
kind of sickness that makes serial killers hunt, rape and murder
women. It's the same sickness that makes a person walk into a grade
school with a rifle and start shooting. It's the same kind of
sickness that makes schoolboys gang rape girls on buses. Power is the
sickness. Stop dreaming about power.
HELP THE NEEDY
CLAIRE
I'm not talking about revolution. I'm not interested in all these arguments for and against the revolution. I am talking about what I've seen and what I think can be done about it. You can't go all over the world looking at miserable, starving, frustrated, beaten down people all the time without feeling something. You try to just tell the story but sometimes, you just can't. There's too much going on. How can you be a human being and just watch while people are suffering. The suffering you actually see is beyond your imagination. Probably, once in a while, when you see some situation where a bunch of innocent children are shot down in cold blood and you see the grief and you imagine the loss, in those situations, you get a taste of everyday life for millions of people. So fuck the revolution. Don't start talking bullshit about Che Guevara. Don't get all hot and bothered about how you can kill "the man." Do something to empower the poor. Do something to feed them, house them, provide sanitation for them, educate them. That will start the revolution.
I'm not talking about revolution. I'm not interested in all these arguments for and against the revolution. I am talking about what I've seen and what I think can be done about it. You can't go all over the world looking at miserable, starving, frustrated, beaten down people all the time without feeling something. You try to just tell the story but sometimes, you just can't. There's too much going on. How can you be a human being and just watch while people are suffering. The suffering you actually see is beyond your imagination. Probably, once in a while, when you see some situation where a bunch of innocent children are shot down in cold blood and you see the grief and you imagine the loss, in those situations, you get a taste of everyday life for millions of people. So fuck the revolution. Don't start talking bullshit about Che Guevara. Don't get all hot and bothered about how you can kill "the man." Do something to empower the poor. Do something to feed them, house them, provide sanitation for them, educate them. That will start the revolution.
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
QUOTES AND DISCUSSION
Citizens,
did you want a revolution without revolution? Original French: Citoyens,
vouliez-vous une révolution sans révolution?
Réponse à J.- B. Louvet, a speech to the
National Convention (5 November 1792)
Look at the American Revolution in 1776. That
revolution was for what? For land. Why did they want land? Independence. How
was it carried out? Bloodshed. Number one, it was based on land, the basis of
independence. And the only way they could get it was bloodshed. The French
Revolution —— what was it based on? The land—less against the landlord. What
was it for? Land. How did they get it? Bloodshed. Was no love lost; was no
compromise; was no negotiation. I’m telling you, you don’t know what a
revolution is. ’Cause when you find out what it is, you’ll get back in the
alley; you’ll get out of the way. The Russian Revolution —— what was it based
on? Land. The land—less against the landlord. How did they bring it about?
Bloodshed. You haven’t got a revolution that doesn’t involve bloodshed. And
you’re afraid to bleed. I said, you’re afraid to bleed.
“The smallest
and most inoffensive state is still criminal in its dreams.” Bakunin
“Certain
women enjoy rough sex. I suppose they like to feel humiliated, cheap, dirty,
nasty.” Roxanne Hall
“These
it is who kill the rich crop of reason with the barren thorns of passion,
who accustom men’s minds to disease, instead
of setting them free.” Boethius
“I
desire mercy, not sacrifice.” Jesus
“Once upon a time, Chuang Tzu dreamed that he was a
butterfly, flying about enjoying itself. It did not know that it was Chuang Tzu.
Suddenly he awoke, and veritably was Chuang Tzu again. He did not know whether
it was Chuang Tzu dreaming that he was a butterfly, or whether it was the
butterfly dreaming that it was Chuang Tzu. Between Chuang Tzu and the butterfly there must be some
distinction. This is a case of what is called the transformation of things.”
Chaung Tzu
“Individuals and masses attribute everything that irks
them, without exception, to the existing dispensation, while for the most part
what they are suffering under is inherent human frailty.” Jacob Burckhardt, Force and Freedom
“The
realization of ethical values on earth by the state would simply be brought to
grief again and again by the spiritual inadequacy of human nature in general,
and even by the best of humanity in particular.” Jacob Burckhardt, Force and
Freedom
"Poor
naked wretches, whereso'er you are,
That
bide the pelting of this pitiless storm,
How
shall your houseless heads and unfed sides,
Your
loop'd and window'd raggedness, defend you
From
seasons such as these? O, I have ta'en
Too
little care of this! Take physic, pomp;
Expose
thyself to feel what wretches feel,
That
thou mayst shake the superflux to them,
And
show the heavens more just."
William
Shakespeare, King Lear
Because
I see so many weak ones trodden down, I greatly doubt the sincerity of much
that is called progress and civilization, but only in the kind that is founded
on real humanity. That which costs human life I think cruel, and I do not
respect it.
—–Vincent van Gogh, The Hague, December 1881
Because
I see so many weak ones trodden down, I greatly doubt the sincerity of much
that is called progress and civilization.’
—–Vincent van Gogh, The Hague, December 1881
“No one who puts his hand to the plow and looks back is
fit for service in the kingdom of God.” Luke 9:62, The Bible
"Who knows the fate of his bones or how often he is
to be buried? Who hath the oracle of his ashes or whither they are to be
scattered?" Thomas Browne
"Who knows the fate of his bones or how often he is
to be buried? Who hath the oracle of his ashes or whither they are to be
scattered?" Thomas Browne
"Who knows the fate of his bones or how often he is
to be buried? Who hath the oracle of his ashes or whither they are to be
scattered?" Thomas Browne
“To overthrow the authority of the bourgeois class, the
humiliated population has reason to institute a brief period of terror and to
assault bodily a handful of contemptible, hateful individuals. It is difficult
to attack the authority of a class without a few heads belonging to members of
that class being paraded on a stake.” Benny Levy
The thought of American theologian and intellectual
Reinhold Niebuhr (1892-1971) is marked by the recognition of "the force
and pervasive reality of human sin," an abiding faith in a merciful God,
and a deep engagement with American society and culture. Niebuhr's attitude can
be characterized as one of pessimistic hope, or, to invoke one of Niebuhr's own
expressions, "pessimistic optimism." He rejects the easy optimism
that Americans find so appealing and discounts the doctrine of American
exceptionalism.
“It was wrong in the optimism which stated that the law
of love needed only to be stated persuasively to overcome the selfishness of
the human heart. The unhappy consequence of that optimism was to discharge
interest in the necessary mechanisms of social justice at the precise moment in
history when the development of a technical civilization required more than
ever that social ideals be implemented with economic and political techniques
designed to correct the injustices and brutalities which flow invariably from
an unrestrained and undisciplined exercise of economic power.” Reinhold Niebuhr
Monday, February 25, 2013
ROAD TO A LAWLESS SOCIETY
"The road to a lawless society is currently being paved by the congressional sequester. Budget cuts will just make it more difficult for the feds to capture terrorists and child molesters. What they're going to do is amputate the long arm of the law. We're not going to sit back and go gentle into the sequester. The consequences are dire. It's unfortunate we have to reach this point."
WE NEED CHAOS
MIKLOS
They will tell you that democracy is working just fine. That democracy is suffering the usual growing pains in a fast-changing world filled with new technologies and new possibilities for communication. They will tell you to wait and see what happens. Don't jump to conclusions. Don't take unnecessary risks before we've had time to seriously analyze the problem. And besides, we have to be aware of the dangers of fascism and totalitarianism that are waiting for us if we act too quickly. We may only bring down the walls of Jericho and create chaos before we have anything ready to replace the existing order. And when that order falls, we won't be able to fix it. This is the standard argument you will hear against revolution in the rich and successful countries. These arguments will come from the liberals and the conservatives. They will come from the young and the old. These are the standard arguments of people who are afraid. It's not that I don't understand their fear. I just wish they could understand that the time for change is now. The world is drifting toward chaos one way or the other. Chaos is the only thing that can bring real change. I say that the first step in any revolution has to be letting go of the past. Letting go of the things that tell you revolution is bad. Open your minds and press the chaos button because we desperately NEED CHAOS.
They will tell you that democracy is working just fine. That democracy is suffering the usual growing pains in a fast-changing world filled with new technologies and new possibilities for communication. They will tell you to wait and see what happens. Don't jump to conclusions. Don't take unnecessary risks before we've had time to seriously analyze the problem. And besides, we have to be aware of the dangers of fascism and totalitarianism that are waiting for us if we act too quickly. We may only bring down the walls of Jericho and create chaos before we have anything ready to replace the existing order. And when that order falls, we won't be able to fix it. This is the standard argument you will hear against revolution in the rich and successful countries. These arguments will come from the liberals and the conservatives. They will come from the young and the old. These are the standard arguments of people who are afraid. It's not that I don't understand their fear. I just wish they could understand that the time for change is now. The world is drifting toward chaos one way or the other. Chaos is the only thing that can bring real change. I say that the first step in any revolution has to be letting go of the past. Letting go of the things that tell you revolution is bad. Open your minds and press the chaos button because we desperately NEED CHAOS.
FLASHLIGHT IN THE DARKNESS
MIKLOS
You can't expect me to provide solutions to the problems of the world. My job is to help you see the problems clearly. My job is to shine a light into all your hiding places so you don't think you're solving problems when you're actually just hiding. My job is to be sure that you are aware of all the tricks the capitalists will play to convince you that things are changing and getting better. You have to stop being naive. You have to be willing to see what is happening. And you also have to be willing to take action. I can't be the guide for this action. I am only the guy with the flashlight in the darkness.
You can't expect me to provide solutions to the problems of the world. My job is to help you see the problems clearly. My job is to shine a light into all your hiding places so you don't think you're solving problems when you're actually just hiding. My job is to be sure that you are aware of all the tricks the capitalists will play to convince you that things are changing and getting better. You have to stop being naive. You have to be willing to see what is happening. And you also have to be willing to take action. I can't be the guide for this action. I am only the guy with the flashlight in the darkness.
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
THE LINE BETWEEN REALISM AND PARANOIA
TOM
Where is the line? Where does realism become excess and even paranoia? It's not an easy question. If somebody doesn't pull back at some point, then conflict becomes inevitable. And history has shown over and over that signs of weakness in a government can be interpreted as an invitation to attack or invade. At the same time, World War I was an amazing example of misunderstandings and incorrect assumptions, strange treaties of mutual protection and paraniod fantasies leading to absolute chaos. Most analysts believe that WWI was avoidable. Of course, historical speculation is not perfect. It's just as easy to argue that all the paranoia was the result of foolish and shortsighted colonialism that was bound to lead to war sooner or later. Historical inevitability is hard to establish but the possibility that things could have been different is almost equally hard to prove. Some measure of caution and preparedness for war clearly prevents war. But too much indulgence in arms buildup and military posturing also invites war or creates the conditions for war. Where is the line? Back to the beginning. It's not so easy to be comfortable trying to establish such a line but what else is the job of the policy-maker? How much military force do we need? What do we need to do to convince our enemies that we are serious about using military force? We have to provide practical answers to these questions and we have to hope that we're pretty much right. In that case, history and psychology are pretty much all we've got.
Where is the line? Where does realism become excess and even paranoia? It's not an easy question. If somebody doesn't pull back at some point, then conflict becomes inevitable. And history has shown over and over that signs of weakness in a government can be interpreted as an invitation to attack or invade. At the same time, World War I was an amazing example of misunderstandings and incorrect assumptions, strange treaties of mutual protection and paraniod fantasies leading to absolute chaos. Most analysts believe that WWI was avoidable. Of course, historical speculation is not perfect. It's just as easy to argue that all the paranoia was the result of foolish and shortsighted colonialism that was bound to lead to war sooner or later. Historical inevitability is hard to establish but the possibility that things could have been different is almost equally hard to prove. Some measure of caution and preparedness for war clearly prevents war. But too much indulgence in arms buildup and military posturing also invites war or creates the conditions for war. Where is the line? Back to the beginning. It's not so easy to be comfortable trying to establish such a line but what else is the job of the policy-maker? How much military force do we need? What do we need to do to convince our enemies that we are serious about using military force? We have to provide practical answers to these questions and we have to hope that we're pretty much right. In that case, history and psychology are pretty much all we've got.
FORCE THE RICH
MIKLOS
Force the rich to explain why they should have more - allow them no excuses. No way out. Show them that they are outnumbered and they can no longer be allowed to do whatever they want. To starve people, to hoard and waste resources, to rape the environment, use people as labor and as consumers. We have to do whatever it takes to rip control out of their hands and keep it out of their hands. Take back the government, the planet, your dignity and your future.
Force the rich to explain why they should have more - allow them no excuses. No way out. Show them that they are outnumbered and they can no longer be allowed to do whatever they want. To starve people, to hoard and waste resources, to rape the environment, use people as labor and as consumers. We have to do whatever it takes to rip control out of their hands and keep it out of their hands. Take back the government, the planet, your dignity and your future.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)